|
| Diploma Construction P/L v Esslemont Nominees P/L [2006] WASAT 350 |
Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - Whether decision permitting adjudication to proceed reviewable. Raymond.C. State Administrative Tribunal, Western Australia. Commercial & Civil Stream. 30th November 2006. |
|
| Marine & Civil Bauer Joint Venture v Leighton Kumagai Joint Venture [2005] WASAT 269 |
Application for review of decision by adjudicator declining jurisdiction : Whether a constructions contract as defined : Whether if condition precedent to claim not fulfilled the claim is a payment claim as defined. Mr C Raymond (Senior Member) State Administrative Tribunal. Western Australia. 4th October 2005. |
|
| Merym P/L v Methodist Ladies College [2008] WASAT 164 |
Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - Whether previously rejected claims amenable to adjudication by reason of superintendent\'s failure to certify in time - Whether decision to dismiss characterised as a decision made under s 31(2)(a) of Construction Contracts Act 2004. Mr C Raymond. 21st July 2008 |
|
| Moroney v Murray River North P/L [2008] WASAT 36 |
Construction contracts - Jurisdiction - Adjudicator has not made a determination if a matter falls within its jurisdiction or if he has made a determination the reasons for his decision are not clear - Inviting adjudicator to clarify the determination and provide reasons for same - Procedures an adjudicator may utilise to obtain sufficient information to make a determination - complexity of a matter. Dr B De Villiers, Member. 19th February 2008 |
|
| O\'Donnell Griffin P/L v John Holland P/L & Multiplex Contractors P/L t/a Raillink Joint Venture [2008] WASC 58 |
Building and construction - Payment dispute - Security of payment legislation - Determination by adjudicator under Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - Application for leave to enforce as a judgment of the Supreme Court - Principles governing the exercise of discretion to grant leave. BEECH J: 17th April 2008.
|
|
| O\\\'Donnell Griffin P/L v Davis [2007] WASC 215 (7 September 2007) |
Practice and procedure - Application for interlocutory injunction to prevent adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - No cause of action disclosed - Failure to comply with O 59 r 9 - Damages an adequate remedy - Balance of convenience favours defendant - Indemnity costs. Templeman J. 7th September 2007 |
|
| Silent Vector P/L t/a Sizer Buiders & Squarcini [2008] WASAT 39 |
Application for review of decision by adjudicator dismissing application without determination on the merits - Whether application could not be fairly determined because of complexity - Whether application not made within prescribed time - Adequacy of reasons for decision. Mr C Raymond, Senior Member. 22nd February 2008 |
|
